Rat ELISA Kits Search Results


90
Rocky Mountain Diagnostics rat enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) kits
Rat Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa) Kits, supplied by Rocky Mountain Diagnostics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+enzyme+linked+immunosorbent+assay++elisa++kits/pmc06443850-84-13-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Hangzhou Eastbiopharm Co rat bdnf elisa kits
Rat Bdnf Elisa Kits, supplied by Hangzhou Eastbiopharm Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+bdnf+elisa+kits/10__2147_slash_jep__s237378-47-7-11
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat bdnf elisa kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MyBiosource Biotechnology rat-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) kits
Rat Specific Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (Elisa) Kits, supplied by MyBiosource Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+enzyme+linked+immunosorbent+assay++elisa++kits/pm39167169-51-5-22
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (elisa) kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cloud-Clone corp pig elisa kit
Pig Elisa Kit, supplied by Cloud-Clone corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+elisa+kits/pmc06743298-129-10-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pig elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MyBiosource Biotechnology rat specific elisa kit
Rat Specific Elisa Kit, supplied by MyBiosource Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+elisa+kits/pm37840086-77-11-15
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat specific elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-rat opt-eia elisa kits
Anti Rat Opt Eia Elisa Kits, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/anti+rat+opt+eia+elisa+kits/pm19759244-108-12-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-rat opt-eia elisa kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MyBiosource Biotechnology jak2 elisa kit
Jak2 Elisa Kit, supplied by MyBiosource Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/elisa+rat+kits+jak2/pm34933726-67-9-10
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
jak2 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
AnaSpec sensolyte anti-humanβ-amyloid (1-42) quantitative elisa kit
Foxo3 signaling in primary neurons. (A) Primary cortical neurons were treated with glutamate (100 µM) for 6 h in the presence or absence of roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA, followed by immunostaining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The percentage of cells showing nuclear translocation of Cdk5 and Foxo3. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells; #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (C) Foxo3 promoter activity was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (D–G) Bim, FasL, MnSOD and APP promoter activities were measured upon various treatments. *P<0.01, compared with untreated primary cortical neurons (Student's t-test); #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (H) Foxo3 levels were analyzed upon glutamate (12 h), roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA treatments. (I) Bim or MnSOD levels were analyzed upon glutamate, roscovitine, Foxo3 shRNA and Cdk5 shRNA treatments for 12 h. (J) Primary cortical neurons cells were treated with 100 µM glutamate for 18 h. Cdk5 shRNA or Foxo3 shRNA were added 30 h prior to glutamate treatment. Aβ(1–42) released into the medium was measured with an <t>ELISA</t> kit. *P<0.01, compared with untreated neurons (Student's t-test). Graphical results are mean±s.e.m. Each experiment was repeated at least three independent times.
Sensolyte Anti Humanβ Amyloid (1 42) Quantitative Elisa Kit, supplied by AnaSpec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/elisa+kits+rat++amyloid+1+42/pmc04893801-564-21-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sensolyte anti-humanβ-amyloid (1-42) quantitative elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Abnova commercial cytokine elisa kits
Foxo3 signaling in primary neurons. (A) Primary cortical neurons were treated with glutamate (100 µM) for 6 h in the presence or absence of roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA, followed by immunostaining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The percentage of cells showing nuclear translocation of Cdk5 and Foxo3. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells; #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (C) Foxo3 promoter activity was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (D–G) Bim, FasL, MnSOD and APP promoter activities were measured upon various treatments. *P<0.01, compared with untreated primary cortical neurons (Student's t-test); #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (H) Foxo3 levels were analyzed upon glutamate (12 h), roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA treatments. (I) Bim or MnSOD levels were analyzed upon glutamate, roscovitine, Foxo3 shRNA and Cdk5 shRNA treatments for 12 h. (J) Primary cortical neurons cells were treated with 100 µM glutamate for 18 h. Cdk5 shRNA or Foxo3 shRNA were added 30 h prior to glutamate treatment. Aβ(1–42) released into the medium was measured with an <t>ELISA</t> kit. *P<0.01, compared with untreated neurons (Student's t-test). Graphical results are mean±s.e.m. Each experiment was repeated at least three independent times.
Commercial Cytokine Elisa Kits, supplied by Abnova, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+elisa+kits/pmc03938501-167-13-17
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
commercial cytokine elisa kits - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
EIAab Inc rat vwf elisa kit
Foxo3 signaling in primary neurons. (A) Primary cortical neurons were treated with glutamate (100 µM) for 6 h in the presence or absence of roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA, followed by immunostaining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The percentage of cells showing nuclear translocation of Cdk5 and Foxo3. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells; #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (C) Foxo3 promoter activity was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (D–G) Bim, FasL, MnSOD and APP promoter activities were measured upon various treatments. *P<0.01, compared with untreated primary cortical neurons (Student's t-test); #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (H) Foxo3 levels were analyzed upon glutamate (12 h), roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA treatments. (I) Bim or MnSOD levels were analyzed upon glutamate, roscovitine, Foxo3 shRNA and Cdk5 shRNA treatments for 12 h. (J) Primary cortical neurons cells were treated with 100 µM glutamate for 18 h. Cdk5 shRNA or Foxo3 shRNA were added 30 h prior to glutamate treatment. Aβ(1–42) released into the medium was measured with an <t>ELISA</t> kit. *P<0.01, compared with untreated neurons (Student's t-test). Graphical results are mean±s.e.m. Each experiment was repeated at least three independent times.
Rat Vwf Elisa Kit, supplied by EIAab Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+elisa+kits/pmc04055103-82-20-28
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat vwf elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
SPI Bio Inc mouse/rat leptin enzyme immunoassay kit
Tau deficiency inhibits an anorexigenic effect of brain insulin administration leading to metabolic disturbances. (A) Cumulative food intake for 24 h measured using metabolic cages in tau KO and littermate controls intracerebroventricularly injected first with vehicle and then 2 µl insulin (5 mg/ml; ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT-PBS; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). (B) Cumulated food intake in WT and tau KO mice 24 h after vehicle or insulin brain injection (same animals as in A; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 vs. WT-PBS; #, P < 0.05 vs. WT/insulin; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; one-way ANOVA, LSD Fisher’s post-hoc test). (C) 48-h body weight variation after vehicle or insulin brain injection in tau KO and WT littermates (same animals as in A; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). Data in A–C show mean ± SEM from 5–10 mice per group from three independent experiments. (D) Mean food intake (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (E) Ambulatory activity (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (F) Body weight gain (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (G) Plasma <t>leptin</t> levels (**, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (H and I) Adipose tissue weight (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (J) Glycemia. (K) Insulinemia (*, P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (L) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA) in tau KO mice and littermate controls. Quantifications represent mean ± SEM. Controls are indicated as open circles/bars, tau KO as black circles/bars. Dashed lines/bars represent insulin-treated animals. Mice were 6–8 mo old at time of experiments and sacrifice. Metabolic data in C–L show mean ± SEM from 10–12 (D), 9–12 (E), 13–27 (F), 4–5 (G), 11–14 (H and I), 15–17 (J), 20–23 (K), and 12–14 (L) mice per group acquired from three independent experiments.
Mouse/Rat Leptin Enzyme Immunoassay Kit, supplied by SPI Bio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/elisa+kits+for+rat+prolactin/pmc05551570-206-14-19
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse/rat leptin enzyme immunoassay kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
USCN Life rat elisa kit
Tau deficiency inhibits an anorexigenic effect of brain insulin administration leading to metabolic disturbances. (A) Cumulative food intake for 24 h measured using metabolic cages in tau KO and littermate controls intracerebroventricularly injected first with vehicle and then 2 µl insulin (5 mg/ml; ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT-PBS; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). (B) Cumulated food intake in WT and tau KO mice 24 h after vehicle or insulin brain injection (same animals as in A; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 vs. WT-PBS; #, P < 0.05 vs. WT/insulin; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; one-way ANOVA, LSD Fisher’s post-hoc test). (C) 48-h body weight variation after vehicle or insulin brain injection in tau KO and WT littermates (same animals as in A; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). Data in A–C show mean ± SEM from 5–10 mice per group from three independent experiments. (D) Mean food intake (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (E) Ambulatory activity (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (F) Body weight gain (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (G) Plasma <t>leptin</t> levels (**, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (H and I) Adipose tissue weight (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (J) Glycemia. (K) Insulinemia (*, P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (L) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA) in tau KO mice and littermate controls. Quantifications represent mean ± SEM. Controls are indicated as open circles/bars, tau KO as black circles/bars. Dashed lines/bars represent insulin-treated animals. Mice were 6–8 mo old at time of experiments and sacrifice. Metabolic data in C–L show mean ± SEM from 10–12 (D), 9–12 (E), 13–27 (F), 4–5 (G), 11–14 (H and I), 15–17 (J), 20–23 (K), and 12–14 (L) mice per group acquired from three independent experiments.
Rat Elisa Kit, supplied by USCN Life, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/Rat+ELISA+Kits/rat+elisa+kits/pmc03770074-162-26-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Foxo3 signaling in primary neurons. (A) Primary cortical neurons were treated with glutamate (100 µM) for 6 h in the presence or absence of roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA, followed by immunostaining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The percentage of cells showing nuclear translocation of Cdk5 and Foxo3. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells; #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (C) Foxo3 promoter activity was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (D–G) Bim, FasL, MnSOD and APP promoter activities were measured upon various treatments. *P<0.01, compared with untreated primary cortical neurons (Student's t-test); #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (H) Foxo3 levels were analyzed upon glutamate (12 h), roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA treatments. (I) Bim or MnSOD levels were analyzed upon glutamate, roscovitine, Foxo3 shRNA and Cdk5 shRNA treatments for 12 h. (J) Primary cortical neurons cells were treated with 100 µM glutamate for 18 h. Cdk5 shRNA or Foxo3 shRNA were added 30 h prior to glutamate treatment. Aβ(1–42) released into the medium was measured with an ELISA kit. *P<0.01, compared with untreated neurons (Student's t-test). Graphical results are mean±s.e.m. Each experiment was repeated at least three independent times.

Journal: Journal of Cell Science

Article Title: Cdk5–Foxo3 axis: initially neuroprotective, eventually neurodegenerative in Alzheimer's disease models

doi: 10.1242/jcs.185009

Figure Lengend Snippet: Foxo3 signaling in primary neurons. (A) Primary cortical neurons were treated with glutamate (100 µM) for 6 h in the presence or absence of roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA, followed by immunostaining. Scale bar: 20 μm. (B) The percentage of cells showing nuclear translocation of Cdk5 and Foxo3. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells; #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (C) Foxo3 promoter activity was determined as described in the Materials and Methods. *P<0.01, compared with untreated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (D–G) Bim, FasL, MnSOD and APP promoter activities were measured upon various treatments. *P<0.01, compared with untreated primary cortical neurons (Student's t-test); #P<0.01, compared with glutamate-treated HT22 cells (Student's t-test). (H) Foxo3 levels were analyzed upon glutamate (12 h), roscovitine and Cdk5 shRNA treatments. (I) Bim or MnSOD levels were analyzed upon glutamate, roscovitine, Foxo3 shRNA and Cdk5 shRNA treatments for 12 h. (J) Primary cortical neurons cells were treated with 100 µM glutamate for 18 h. Cdk5 shRNA or Foxo3 shRNA were added 30 h prior to glutamate treatment. Aβ(1–42) released into the medium was measured with an ELISA kit. *P<0.01, compared with untreated neurons (Student's t-test). Graphical results are mean±s.e.m. Each experiment was repeated at least three independent times.

Article Snippet: Both APP-swe HT22 cells and primary cortial neurons were treated with glutamate for 18 h. The released β-amyloid was measured using SensoLyte ® Anti-Humanβ-amyloid (1-42) Quantitative ELISA kit (Anaspec, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Techniques: shRNA, Immunostaining, Translocation Assay, Activity Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

Tau deficiency inhibits an anorexigenic effect of brain insulin administration leading to metabolic disturbances. (A) Cumulative food intake for 24 h measured using metabolic cages in tau KO and littermate controls intracerebroventricularly injected first with vehicle and then 2 µl insulin (5 mg/ml; ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT-PBS; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). (B) Cumulated food intake in WT and tau KO mice 24 h after vehicle or insulin brain injection (same animals as in A; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 vs. WT-PBS; #, P < 0.05 vs. WT/insulin; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; one-way ANOVA, LSD Fisher’s post-hoc test). (C) 48-h body weight variation after vehicle or insulin brain injection in tau KO and WT littermates (same animals as in A; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). Data in A–C show mean ± SEM from 5–10 mice per group from three independent experiments. (D) Mean food intake (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (E) Ambulatory activity (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (F) Body weight gain (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (G) Plasma leptin levels (**, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (H and I) Adipose tissue weight (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (J) Glycemia. (K) Insulinemia (*, P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (L) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA) in tau KO mice and littermate controls. Quantifications represent mean ± SEM. Controls are indicated as open circles/bars, tau KO as black circles/bars. Dashed lines/bars represent insulin-treated animals. Mice were 6–8 mo old at time of experiments and sacrifice. Metabolic data in C–L show mean ± SEM from 10–12 (D), 9–12 (E), 13–27 (F), 4–5 (G), 11–14 (H and I), 15–17 (J), 20–23 (K), and 12–14 (L) mice per group acquired from three independent experiments.

Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine

Article Title: Tau deletion promotes brain insulin resistance

doi: 10.1084/jem.20161731

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tau deficiency inhibits an anorexigenic effect of brain insulin administration leading to metabolic disturbances. (A) Cumulative food intake for 24 h measured using metabolic cages in tau KO and littermate controls intracerebroventricularly injected first with vehicle and then 2 µl insulin (5 mg/ml; ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT-PBS; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). (B) Cumulated food intake in WT and tau KO mice 24 h after vehicle or insulin brain injection (same animals as in A; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 vs. WT-PBS; #, P < 0.05 vs. WT/insulin; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; one-way ANOVA, LSD Fisher’s post-hoc test). (C) 48-h body weight variation after vehicle or insulin brain injection in tau KO and WT littermates (same animals as in A; °°°, P < 0.001 vs. tau KO/insulin; two-way ANOVA). Data in A–C show mean ± SEM from 5–10 mice per group from three independent experiments. (D) Mean food intake (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (E) Ambulatory activity (*, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (F) Body weight gain (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA). (G) Plasma leptin levels (**, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (H and I) Adipose tissue weight (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, Student’s t test). (J) Glycemia. (K) Insulinemia (*, P < 0.05, Student’s t test). (L) Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (***, P < 0.05, two-way ANOVA) in tau KO mice and littermate controls. Quantifications represent mean ± SEM. Controls are indicated as open circles/bars, tau KO as black circles/bars. Dashed lines/bars represent insulin-treated animals. Mice were 6–8 mo old at time of experiments and sacrifice. Metabolic data in C–L show mean ± SEM from 10–12 (D), 9–12 (E), 13–27 (F), 4–5 (G), 11–14 (H and I), 15–17 (J), 20–23 (K), and 12–14 (L) mice per group acquired from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: Plasma insulin and leptin were measured using ultrasensitive insulin ELISA (Mercodia AB) and a mouse/rat leptin enzyme immunoassay kit (Spibio), respectively.

Techniques: Injection, Activity Assay, Clinical Proteomics